Библиография

1. 1. Venable R.M., Krämer A., Pastor R.W. Molecular dynamics simulations of membrane permeability // Chem. Rev. 2019. V. 119. № 9. P. 5954–5997. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00486
2. 2. A N.V.N., Jougnot D., Thanh L.D., et al. Predicting water flow in fully and partially saturated porous media: A new fractal-based permeability model // Hydrogeol. J. 2021. V. 29. P. 2017–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02364-6
3. 3. Yoshioka T., Kotaka K., Nakagawa K., et al. Molecular dynamics simulation study of polyamide membrane structures and RO/FO water permeation properties // Membranes. 2018. V. 8. № 4. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8040127
4. 4. Gonçalves J.A., Batista R.J.C., Barbosa M.C. Water in nanoporous hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets: a first-principles study // Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2025. V. 16. P. 510–519. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.16.39
5. 5. Kiran P.S., Indupuri S., Kumar K.V., et al. Fabrication of nanoporous multilayer graphene nanoplatelets membrane for water desalination // Desalination. 2024. V. 575. P. 117291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117291
6. 6. Tiwary S.K., Singh M., Chavan S.V., Karim A. Graphene oxide-based membranes for water desalination and purification // npj 2D Materials and Applications. 2024. V. 8. P. 27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-024-00462-z
7. 7. Ali I., Zenab Hasan S., Garcia H., Danquah M.K., Innanova G. Recent advances in graphene-based nano-membranes for desalination // Chem. Eng. J. 2024. V. 483. P. 149108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.149108
8. 8. Kim Y., Cruz S.S., Lee K., et al. Remote epitaxy through graphene enables two-dimensional material-based layer transfer // Nature. 2017. V. 544. P. 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22053
9. 9. Ji J., Kwak H.M., Yu J., et al. Understanding the 2D-material and substrate interaction during epitaxial growth towards successful remote epitaxy: a review // Nano Convergence. 2023. V. 10. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-023-00368-4
10. 10. Wang X., Choi J., Yoo J., Hong Y.J. Unveiling the mechanism of remote epitaxy of crystalline semiconductors on 2D materials-coated substrates // Nano Convergence. 2023. V. 10. P. 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-023-00387-1
11. 11. Frenkel D., Smit B. Understanding molecular simulation: From algorithms to applications, 3rd ed. Academic. New York. 2023.
12. 12. Ackland G.J., Jones A.P. Applications of local crystal structure measures in experiment and simulation // Phys. Rev. B. 2006. V. 73. P. 054104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.054104
13. 13. Stukowski A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO – The open visualization tool // Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2010. V. 18. P. 015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012
14. 14. Thompson A.P., Aktulga H.M., Berger R., et al. LAMMPS - A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales // Computer Physics Communications. 2022. V. 271. P. 108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171