Библиография

1. 1. Tauford C. The hydrophobic effect: Formation of micelles and biological membranes. 2–nd Ed. J. Wiley & Sons. Toronto. 1980.
2. 2. Israelachvili J., Mitchell D., Ninham B. Theory of self-assembly of hydrocarbon amphiphiles into micelles and bilayers // J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. II. 1976. V. 72. P. 1525–1568. https://doi.org/10.1039/F29767201525
3. 3. Kshevetskiy M., Shchekin A. The aggregation work and shape of molecular aggregates upon the transition from spherical to globular and cylindrical micelles // Colloid J. 2005. V. 67. P. 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10595-005-0100-x
4. 4. Lerebours B., Perly B., Pileni M. Polymerization of cetyltrimethylammonium methacrylate direct micelles // Progress in Colloid and Polymer Science. 1989. V. 79. P. 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0116215
5. 5. Blankschtein D., Thurston G., Benedek G.B.J. Phenomenological theory of equilibrium thermodynamic properties and phase separation of micellar solutions // J. Chem. Phys. 1986. V. 85. № 12. P. 7268–7288. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.451365
6. 6. Yoshimura S., Shirai S., Einaga Y. Light-scattering characterization of the wormlike micelles of hexaoxyethylene dodecyl CE and hexaoxyethylene tetradecyl CE ethers in dilute aqueous solution // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004. V. 108. № 40. P. 15477–15487. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0488214
7. 7. Imae T., Kamiya R., Ikeda S. Formation of spherical and rodlike micelles of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide in aqueous NaBr solutions // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1985. V. 108. № 1. P. 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797 (85)90253-X
8. 8. Porte G., Poggi Y., Appell J., Maret G. Large micelles in concentrated solutions. The second critical micellar concentration // The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1984. V. 88. № 23. P. 5713–5720. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150667a051
9. 9. Ruckenstein E., Nagarajan R. Aggregation of amphiphiles in nonaqueous media // J. Phys. Chem. 1980. V. 84. № 11. P. 1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100448a013
10. 10. Ljunggren S., Eriksson J. The mechanics and thermodynamics of dischanged micelles // J. Chem. SOC., Faraday Trans. 2. 1986. V. 82. № 6. P. 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1039/F29868200913
11. 11. Nagarajan R., Ruckenstein E. Theory of surfactant self-assembly: a predictive molecular thermodynamic approach // Langmuir. 1991. V. 7. № 12. P. 2934–2969. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00060a012
12. 12. Zueva O., Rukhov V., Zuev Yu. Morphology of ionic micelles as studied by numerical solution of the Poisson equation // ACS Omega. 2022. V. 7. № 7. P. 6174–6183. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c06665
13. 13. Zueva O., Kusova A., Makarova A., et al. Reciprocal effects of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and oppositely charged surfactants in bulk water and at interface // Colloids and surfaces A. 2020. V. 603. P. 125296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125296
14. 14. Bradley-Shaw J., Camp P., Dowding P., Lewias K. Glycerol monoclastic reverse micelles in nonpolar solvents: Computer simulations and small-angle neutron scattering // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2015. V. 119. № 11. P. 4321–4331. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b00213
15. 15. Movchan T., Rusanov A., Plonikova E. Reverse micelles and protomicelles of tetraethylene glycol mono-dodecyl ether in systems with heptane and nile red // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2022. V. 92. P. 650–658. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363222400065
16. 16. Kopanichuk I., Novikov V., Vanin A., Brodskaya E. The electric properties of AOT reverse micelles by molecular dynamics simulations. // J. Molec. Liquids. 2019. V. 296. P. 111960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111960
17. 17. Kopanichuk I., Vedenchuk E., Koneva A., Vanin A. Structural properties of Span 80/Tween 80 reverse micelles by molecular dynamics simulations // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2018. V. 122. № 33. P. 8047–8055. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b03945
18. 18. Нееdukawa A. Исследование строения обратных мицелл методом молекулярной динамики. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. 2012.
19. 19. Victorov A., Voznesensky M., Safonova E. Spatial networks in solutions of wormlike aggregates: universal behaviour and molecular portraits // Russian chemical reviews. 2015. V. 84. № 7. P. 693–711. https://doi.org/10.1070/RCR4524
20. 20. Victorov A., Molchanov V., Sorina P., et al. Modeling micellar growth and branching in mixtures of zwitterionic with ionic surfactants // Langmuir. 2022. V. 38. № 39. P. 11929–11940. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01677
21. 21. Palazzo G. Wormlike reverse micelles // Soft Matter. 2013. V. 9. № 45. P. 10668–10677. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3SM52193A
22. 22. Nagarajan R. Structure-performance relationships in surfactants. Ed. by K. Esumi, M. Ueno. Surfactant Science. V. 112. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 2013.
23. 23. Danov K., Kralchevsky P., Stoyanov S., et al. Analytical modeling of micelle growth. 1. Chain-conformation free energy of binary mixed spherical, wormlike and lamellar micelles // Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2019. V. 547. P. 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.105
24. 24. Danov K., Kralchevsky P., Stoyanov S., et al. Growth of wormlike micelles in nonionic surfactant solutions: Quantitative theory vs. experiment // Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018. V. 256. P. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2018.05.006
25. 25. Iyer J., Blankschtein D. Molecular-thermodynamic framework to predict the micellization behavior of mixtures of fluorocarbon-based and hydrocarbon-based surfactants // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2014. V. 118. № 9. P. 2377–2388. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4047209
26. 26. Goldstye A., Blankschtein D. Molecular-thermodynamic theory of micellization of multicomponent surfactant mixtures: 2. pH-sensitive surfactants // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2007. V. 32. № 11. P. 5953–5962. https://doi.org/10.1021/la063082z
27. 27. Eroshkin Yu., Adchenyan L., Shchekin A. Model of inverse “dry” micelles with coexisting spherical, globular and cylindrical aggregates // Physica A. 2023. V. 615. P. 128615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128615
28. 28. Shchekin A., Adchenyan L., Eroshkin Yu., Volkov N. Work of formation of direct and inverse micelle as a functions of aggregation number // Colloid J. 2022. V. 84. P. 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106193322010124
29. 29. Anachkov S., Kralchevsky P., Danov K., et al. Discline vs. cylindrical micelles: Generalized model of micelle growth and data interpretation // Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2014. V. 416. P. 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.002
30. 30. Rusanov A., Shchekin A. Micelle formation in solutions of surfactants. St. Petersburg: Lan’. 2016. 2nd ed.
31. 31. Smith G., Brown P., James C., et al. The effect of solvent and counterion variation on inverse micelle CMCs in hydrocarbon solvents // Colloids Surf. A. 2016. V. 494. P. 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.01.020
32. 32. Urano R., Pantelopulos G., Straub J. Aerosol-OT surfactant forms stable reverse micelles in apolar solvent in the absence of water // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019. V. 123. № 11. P. 2546–2557. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07847
33. 33. Volkov N., Shchekin A., Posysoev M., et al. Investigation of the structural and transport properties of micellar solutions in polar and nonpolar solvents by the method of molecular dynamics, in modern chemical physics at the intersection of physics, chemistry and biology // Abstracts of the International Scientific Conference. Chernoglovska. 2021. P. 418–419.
34. 34. Smith G., Brown P., Rogers S., Eastoe J. Evidence for a critical micelle concentration of surfactants in hydrocarbon solvents // Langmuir. 2013. V. 29. № 10. P. 3252–3258. https://doi.org/10.1021/la400117s
35. 35. Daful A., Avalos J., Mackie A. Model shape transitions of micelles: spheres to cylinders and disks // Langmuir. 2012. V. 28. № 8. P. 3730–3743. https://doi.org/10.1021/la204132c
36. 36. Johnsson M., Edwards K. Liposomes, disks, and spherical micelles: Aggregate structure in mixtures of gel phase phosphatidylcholines and poly(ethylene glycol)-phospholipids // Biophysical Journal. 2022. V. 85. № 6. P. 3839–3847. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495 (03)74798-5
37. 37. Edmonds W., Li Zh., Hillmyer M., Lodge T. Disk micelles from nonionic coil-coil diblock copolymers // Macromolecules. 2006. V. 39. № 13. P. 4526–4530. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma060633j
38. 38. Rusanov A., Grinin A., Kuni F., Shchekin A. Nanostructural models of micelles and premicellar aggregates // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2002. V. 72. P. 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016348617547
39. 39. Посысоев М. Молекулярно-динамическое моделирование распределения агрегатов по размерам для неионного ПАВ в неполярном растворителе // ВКР. 2022. http://stat.phys.spbu.ru/Aspirant/2022/Posysoev.pdf
40. 40. Naharros-Molinero A., Caballo-Gonzalez M., de la Mata F., Garcia-Gallego S. Direct and reverse pluronic micelles: Design and characterization of promising drug delivery nanosystems // Pharmaceutics. 2022. V. 14. № 12. P. 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122628
41. 41. Helfand E., Frisch H.L., Lebowitz J.L. Theory of the two- and one-dimensional rigid sphere fluids // J. Chem. Phys. 1961. V. 34. № 3. P. 1037. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1731629
42. 42. Santos A., Haro M.L., Yuse S.B. An accurate and simple equation of state for hard disks // J. Chem. Phys. 1995. V. 103. P. 4622–4625. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470649
43. 43. Flory P. Principles Of Polymer Chemistry. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press. 1962.
44. 44. May S., Ben-Shaul A. Molecular packing in cylindrical micelles, Ch. 2 in giant micelles. Properties and applications. Eds. By R. Zana, E.W. Kaler. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group. 2007.